Turkey’s blue-collar labor force – those in manual, technical, and manufacturing roles – has long served as the engine of its industrial and service economies. Yet its productivity remains below that of more advanced nations. The chief culprits: persistent skill gaps and a lack of structured training. Narrowing these gaps through targeted instruction is now widely viewed as essential to improving national competitiveness.
In recent years, Turkey has leaned more heavily on vocational training, hands-on learning, and upskilling initiatives aimed at its working-class base.
This report draws on academic studies published over the past five years to assess the effectiveness of those efforts.
- The Impact of Training Programs on Blue-Collar Workforce Productivity in Turkey
- Historical Context of Vocational Training in Turkey
- Recent Training Programs and Initiatives for Blue-Collar Workers
- Impact on Productivity: Evidence from Recent Studies
- Qualitative Insights: Training Outcomes and Workplace Perceptions
- Summary of Key Findings
- Training programs show potential but limited average effects.
- One-time interventions do not yield lasting results.
- Training quality and relevance are decisive.
- Skill deficits remain a structural constraint.
- Training contributes to qualitative improvements.
- Implementation barriers reduce effectiveness.
- Training works best within a broader economic strategy.
The Impact of Training Programs on Blue-Collar Workforce Productivity in Turkey
Historical Context of Vocational Training in Turkey
Turkey’s push to equip its workforce with technical skills dates back to the early years of the Republic. Vocational schools began operating in the 1930s, and legal scaffolding developed gradually thereafter. A key turning point came with Law No. 3308 in 1986, which codified apprenticeship and vocational education. The law formalized cooperation between schools and industry, setting a national standard for skill instruction across trades.
The 2000s brought further structural reform. Law No. 5544, passed in 2006, created the Vocational Qualification Authority to align Turkey’s training framework with occupational benchmarks. This marked a transformation from fragmented local efforts to a centralized qualifications system, laying the groundwork for more consistent, measurable training across blue-collar sectors.
By the end of that decade, İŞKUR – the Turkish Employment Agency – took center stage. Following a 2008 overhaul, İŞKUR broadened its reach with expanded vocational courses and labor market programs.
The impetus was clear: too many working-age adults lacked foundational or modern skills, and informal learning, long the norm, was no longer sufficient. The state’s training push reflected a growing consensus that improving productivity required formal upskilling, not just entry-level instruction but also ongoing reskilling for existing workers.
Nonetheless, skill gaps persist. As of 2019, only 5.8% of Turkish adults aged 25 to 64 participated in any kind of lifelong learning – a figure barely half the EU average of 10.8%. Older and less-educated workers remain especially underrepresented. This context is paramount. It explains why recent training efforts are seen not as peripheral policy but as central to labor market reform. They aim to close long-standing deficits and prepare blue-collar workers for a more demanding industrial landscape.
Recent Training Programs and Initiatives for Blue-Collar Workers
Over the past decade, Turkey has intensified efforts to train its blue-collar and unemployed labor force. At the center of this push stands İŞKUR’s vocational training program – a set of short-term courses, typically lasting several weeks to a few months.
These courses cover a wide span of trades, from construction and manufacturing to office administration and basic IT. A notable feature is the outsourcing model: private training providers and NGOs now deliver a significant share of the instruction. Some programs also include internships to provide hands-on experience in real-world settings.
A main moment came with the 2010–2011 World Bank-supported randomized evaluation of İŞKUR’s training courses – the first of its kind for a large-scale program in a developing country.
The results were intermixed. Outcomes fell short of expectations, prompting İŞKUR to revise its model. The agency improved how it selected participants and added financial incentives for employers offering on-the-job training.
Since then, practical training schemes – where firms receive subsidies to train new hires – have expanded steadily. These programs tie skill development directly to workplace needs and help firms shape job-ready employees.
Private Sector Engagement in Workforce Development
In parallel, the private sector has become more invested in workforce development. Major industrial players in sectors like automotive, textiles, and steel now operate their own in-house training units – so-called corporate academies.
These centers focus on continual skill upgrading, especially in response to shifts like automation and digitalization. Many firms offer workshops on digital tools and retraining for machine operators and technicians.
According to OECD findings, firms increasingly see a skilled workforce not as a cost center but as a competitive edge, particularly for boosting product quality and innovation.
Strengthening School-Industry Partnerships
A third front involves tighter coordination between schools and employers. Provincial Employment and Vocational Education Boards have been tasked with aligning vocational high school curricula with labor market demand.
Internships and updated coursework aim to bridge the gap between schooling and blue-collar employment. Turkey already has a relatively high proportion of secondary students in vocational tracks – around 49% – and formal pathways exist for continuing to tertiary education.
Yet public perception remains a sticking point. Many families still view white-collar work as more desirable. This stigma weighs on both enrollment quality and worker motivation.
To counter this, recent policy documents call for stronger career counseling and promotion of vocational tracks as viable, respectable career paths. The goal is to correct outdated views and underscore that skilled blue-collar roles offer stable, well-paid employment in modern industries.
A Multi-Pronged Strategy for Enhancing Productivity
Taken together, Turkey’s current approach is broad-based: expanding national training programs, bringing employers into the fold, and tightening links between education and labor demand. These efforts seek to raise the productivity of blue-collar labor amid rising technological and competitive pressures.
Impact on Productivity: Evidence from Recent Studies
Limited Employment Gains from Short-Term Training
Rigorous evaluations of Turkey’s training programs offer a mixed picture of their effect on worker productivity. The most notable study remains the randomized controlled trial (RCT) of İŞKUR’s vocational training courses, published in the Economic Journal (2016) and as a World Bank working paper.
This evaluation tracked thousands of unemployed individuals – some who received training, others who did not – and monitored their employment and income outcomes. The core result was sobering: training had no meaningful effect on employment rates. The difference between trainees and non-trainees was statistically negligible, undermining hopes that short-term courses would rapidly increase productive employment.
Modest Improvements in Job Quality and Wages
Still, the study uncovered modest but meaningful gains in job quality. Trained participants were about three percentage points more likely to secure formal-sector jobs – positions with social security benefits – and earned up to 13% more income in those jobs.
These results suggest that training helped some workers land better roles, perhaps reflecting an improvement in perceived or real productivity. Additionally, trainees tended to shift into slightly more skilled occupations, indicating incremental gains in occupational standing. These effects were modest in size but statistically significant, implying that while training didn’t raise overall employment, it did improve outcomes for those who found work.
Importance of Program Quality and Delivery
The delivery model proved critical. Training programs contracted to private providers – especially those operating under competitive pressure – produced stronger employment effects.
This points to the importance of alignment between training content and labor market demand. It also reinforces the view that program quality, not just access, is central to success. Well-targeted, market-aligned training appears more likely to yield productivity gains.
Short-Lived Benefits in the Long Term
However, follow-up research three years after the original RCT painted a less hopeful picture. The early advantages in formal employment and wages had faded. By that point, trainees and non-trainees performed similarly in the labor market.
This result suggests that skills not reinforced through continued use may lose value, or that broader economic conditions may ultimately outweigh the effects of short-term upskilling. From a productivity standpoint, gains proved temporary. This underlines a structural challenge: stand-alone training programs may offer only short-lived benefits without sustained learning or strong labor demand.
Firm-Level Evidence and International Benchmarks
Other sources provide complementary insights. While firm-level studies in Turkey are limited, international evidence supports a link between training and productivity.
OECD data suggest that a 1% rise in training investment per worker typically boosts firm productivity by about 0.1%, often exceeding wage increases – yielding a net return. This pattern aligns with Turkish case studies: large firms report that structured training, both on and off the job, improves quality, efficiency, and ultimately, profitability.
National Trends: Skill Gaps and Structural Constraints
At the national level, Turkey’s labor productivity growth has been moderate, and skill mismatches remain a core constraint. OECD assessments from 2023 highlight that adult skill proficiency in Turkey – across literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving – remains below international averages. Regions with better-trained workforces exhibit stronger productivity.
Upskilling is thus widely seen as essential to lifting labor output, especially in sectors facing rapid technological change. A McKinsey study found that while automation could raise national productivity significantly, the benefits hinge on a broad “talent transformation.” Without retraining and upskilling, technology alone will not deliver.
Qualitative Insights: Training Outcomes and Workplace Perceptions
Employer Perspectives: Training as a Tool for Quality and Efficiency
Surveys and interviews with Turkish companies reveal that employers view training as essential not just for productivity, but also for product quality, innovation, and workforce morale. Many firms report that training helps workers adapt faster to new technologies or processes, thereby reducing errors and increasing efficiency.
In sectors like manufacturing, structured training – such as lean manufacturing or machine operation workshops – has led to measurable improvements. For instance, some employers in the automotive supply industry noted reduced defect rates and increased output per worker after technical training sessions.
The Retention Problem: Training The Blue-Collar Workforce as a Leverage Risk
Despite these gains, Turkish employers frequently cite the risk of losing trained workers as a major disincentive to invest in upskilling. When a certified welder or technician is hired away by a competitor offering better pay, the original employer loses their training investment.
This poaching problem – common in skill-scarce industries – discourages training and creates a collective action dilemma. Some firms now pair training with retention strategies, such as mandatory service periods or loyalty bonuses, to avoid subsidizing their competitors’ workforce.
Worker Motivation: Advancement vs. Performance
Worker engagement also plays a decisive role in training outcomes. Research indicates that Turkish employees tend to value training linked to career progression – promotions, certifications – over training aimed solely at immediate performance gains.
A factory worker may be more invested in a course that opens the door to a higher role than one that simply makes current tasks marginally more efficient. Programs that lack visible personal benefits often see lower engagement and weaker productivity effects.
Case Study Evidence: High Engagement, High Returns
A recent case study of two high-performing Turkish firms (Balkar & Karadağ, 2023) illustrates the productivity potential of well-managed training.
These firms embedded training within a broader culture of continuous improvement. Workers reported feeling more valued and confident post-training, which translated into stronger morale and teamwork. These qualitative gains supported long-term company growth, showing how training outcomes can exceed the classroom and reshape workplace dynamics.
Low Skill Baselines: Structural Gaps at Entry
However, many blue-collar workers in Turkey enter the labor market with limited technical skills. As noted in the same study, this makes training essential but also demanding. Bridging foundational skill gaps requires more than instruction – it demands a participatory corporate culture.
When companies encourage workers to apply their knowledge, voice improvements, and take initiative, the productivity payoff is stronger. Without such a culture, new skills often go underutilized.
The Role of Evaluation and Feedback
Measuring the effectiveness of training remains a weak spot. Many HR departments in Turkey struggle to assess training outcomes. This has led to a growing interest in performance tracking – using KPIs before and after training to gauge results.
For example, logistics firms may monitor warehouse throughput before and after a course on inventory software. These internal metrics help firms validate and refine their blue-collar training investments.
Pandemic-Era Chnages: Digital Training and Recovery of the Blue-Collar Workforce
The COVID-19 pandemic forced changes in training delivery. Many firms shifted to online or hybrid formats during 2020–2021, especially for theoretical content.
Some companies maintained training via digital platforms and reported quicker productivity recovery post-pandemic. Others cut training altogether under financial pressure, potentially stalling workforce development. The episode highlighted the value of training continuity – even amid crisis.
Summary of Key Findings
Training programs show potential but limited average effects.
Large-scale evaluations, including the randomized study of İŞKUR’s vocational courses, indicate that training has little impact on immediate employment outcomes. Job placement rates for trainees differ insignificantly from those of non-trainees. However, short-term gains do emerge in job quality. Trainees are roughly 3 percentage points more likely to enter formal employment and earn up to 13% more. These figures suggest that while training may not raise overall employment, it helps workers access more stable, better-paying positions – an indirect channel of productivity gain.
One-time interventions do not yield lasting results.
Studies tracking outcomes over multiple years show that early benefits fade. By the second or third year, initial advantages in formal employment and earnings dissipate. This underscores the need for ongoing skill development. Without continuous learning, early improvements vanish, and productivity returns to baseline. Sustained training, not one-off courses, is needed to raise labor productivity over time.
Training quality and relevance are decisive.
Programs tied to private or industry-aligned providers tend to outperform those delivered through standard public channels. Courses that reflect actual job requirements – particularly those with hands-on or firm-based training – show stronger outcomes. In contrast, generic or overly theoretical instruction often fails to translate into on-the-job effectiveness. The closer the training mirrors workplace demands, the higher its productivity payoff.
Skill deficits remain a structural constraint.
Turkey’s adult training participation rate stands at 5.8%, far below the EU average. Many workers enter the labor force with weak foundational skills, forcing training programs to cover basic ground. This gap curtails productivity and limits the country’s ability to adopt advanced technologies at scale. Expanding access to effective training remains a key opportunity for national productivity growth.
Training contributes to qualitative improvements.
Firms that invest in training frequently report higher employee motivation, engagement, and safety compliance. Case studies highlight stronger workplace morale and initiative-taking among trained staff. These softer effects, while harder to quantify, support higher productivity and operational consistency over time.
Implementation barriers reduce effectiveness.
Employers face three recurring challenges: trained workers being poached by other firms, weak mechanisms for evaluating training outcomes, and poor integration of new skills into routine work. To counteract these, some firms now link training to career advancement or loyalty incentives and encourage a participatory workplace culture. Without such strategies, training often yields limited returns.
Training works best within a broader economic strategy.
Training should not be isolated from larger industrial or technological shifts. Policymakers are advised to align upskilling efforts with investments in machinery, process upgrades, and innovation. Workers need environments where new skills can be applied. In parallel, elevating the image of blue-collar work – through better guidance and success narratives – can help draw talent into skilled trades and make training more attractive.
In short:
These studies suggest that while training programs alone are not a silver bullet for productivity, they are a critical component of strengthening Turkey’s blue-collar workforce. When designed and executed well, training initiatives can equip workers with skills that lead to better jobs and improved performance, thereby raising productivity.
The impact is most pronounced when supported by a pro-training culture in firms and by complementary policies (like encouraging innovation and ensuring demand for higher-skilled labor). Continued research and monitoring will be important, but the evidence to date affirms the significant role of training in Turkey’s efforts to boost labor productivity and economic growth.
Sources:
